Harm Assessment
Evaluating potential negative impacts (physical, psychological, societal) of AI systems and defining mitigation strategies.
A targeted review that categorizes harms (safety, privacy, economic, reputational) specific to the AI application. It uses stakeholder impact mapping, severity-likelihood scoring, and mitigation planning (design changes, guardrails, human oversight). Results feed into risk registers and inform whether to proceed, pause, or redesign the system.
Before launching an automated-credit-decision AI, a bank conducts a harm assessment: they identify potential economic harms (denial of services), reputational harms (public backlash), and propose mitigations (appeal processes, external review panels). This ensures that decision pathways and user-support channels are in place before rollout.
We help you find answers
What problem does Enzai solve?
Enzai provides enterprise-grade infrastructure to manage AI risk and compliance. It creates a centralized system of record where AI systems, models, datasets, and governance decisions are documented, assessed, and auditable.
Who is Enzai built for?
How is Enzai different from other governance tools?
Can we start if we have no existing AI governance process?
Does AI governance slow down innovation?
How does Enzai stay aligned with evolving AI regulations?
Research, insights, and updates
Empower your organization to adopt, govern, and monitor AI with enterprise-grade confidence. Built for regulated organizations operating at scale.