XAI Metrics
Quantitative or qualitative measures (e.g., feature importance scores, explanation fidelity) used to assess the quality and reliability of AI explanations.
Metrics that evaluate explanation properties such as fidelity (how well explanations match the true model behavior), stability (consistency of explanations under similar inputs), comprehensiveness (coverage of key features), and simplicity (conciseness for users). Governance uses these metrics to benchmark explanation methods, set acceptance thresholds, and track improvement over time.
An e-commerce platform’s fraud-alert explanations are scored for fidelity by measuring the correlation between feature-attribution rankings and actual model sensitivity. Only explanation methods with fidelity > 0.85 are approved for end-user dashboards, ensuring reliable insights for investigators.
We help you find answers
What problem does Enzai solve?
Enzai provides enterprise-grade infrastructure to manage AI risk and compliance. It creates a centralized system of record where AI systems, models, datasets, and governance decisions are documented, assessed, and auditable.
Who is Enzai built for?
How is Enzai different from other governance tools?
Can we start if we have no existing AI governance process?
Does AI governance slow down innovation?
How does Enzai stay aligned with evolving AI regulations?
Research, insights, and updates
Empower your organization to adopt, govern, and monitor AI with enterprise-grade confidence. Built for regulated organizations operating at scale.