
Risk-Tiered Templates
Pre-built templates for the most common AI use-case types - marketing, support, code, more.
Smart Routing
Each request reaches the right reviewers automatically - no triage meeting, no email chains.
Shadow AI Detection
Surface AI in use today that never came through intake - fold it into governance without blame.
Reuse Approved Patterns
Approved use cases become reusable templates - don't re-litigate the same decision next quarter.
Audit-Grade Intake Decisions
Every approval or rejection logged with reviewers, evidence, and rationale - audit-grade by default.
AI-assisted Form Completion
Upload documentation to automatically complete your AI intake form, with conference scores and a human-in-the-loop to review the output
The intake form is not the bottleneck. The mismatch between review burden and actual risk is the bottleneck - and once people experience that mismatch, they route around the form for the next request. Four patterns recur:
Review burden is flat across risk tiers. A low-risk summarization tool gets the same forms as a customer-facing decision agent. Routine work runs into legal-team capacity; people stop submitting.
Reviewers see the same form, not the slice that matters to them. Legal needs to see contract terms and data-handling clauses; security needs to see auth, network exposure, and tool calls; IT needs to see integration footprint. One generic form serves none of them well.
Decisions don't get reused. Quarter three approves a use case shape that quarter four re-litigates from scratch. The cycle erodes confidence in the intake process.
Shadow AI gets treated as a violation, not a signal. When the intake process is friction-heavy, Shadow AI is the natural workaround. Punitive responses make people hide the next one; surfacing-and-folding-in keeps the inventory accurate.
Failure pattern | Enzai mechanism |
|---|---|
Flat review burden | Risk-tiered templates calibrate depth to use-case type |
Generic forms | Routed slices - each reviewer sees only what they need |
Decisions not reused | Use Case Library - approved patterns become reusable |
Shadow AI punished | Detection surfaces it; intake folds it into inventory |

We help you find answers
What problem does AI use case intake solve?
Enzai gives every AI use case a structured intake path before it becomes Shadow AI. Risk-tiered templates calibrate review burden to actual risk, routing each request through the right legal, risk, IT, and security review automatically.
How does risk-tiered intake work in practice?
How does Enzai handle Shadow AI?
Does Enzai integrate with our existing tools?
What's the difference between intake and inventory?
Can we reuse approved use case patterns?
"Low-risk AI used to wait in the same queue as the high-risk work. Intake is now tiered, routed, and moving."
Ready to make AI intake
move at the pace of the business?
Enzai turns AI intake from a single queue into a tiered workflow - so the simple use cases ship in days and the complex ones get the review they genuinely need.
Hear back in 24 hours

Customer Support Ticket Classification
5 requested AI solutions
Requested on: 7 Nov 2026
Requested by: Enzai
Reviewers:



Automated Contract Risk Review
5 requested AI solutions
Requested on: 7 July 2026
Requested by: Enzai
Reviewers:



Sales Forecasting & Demand Prediction
5 requested AI solutions
Requested on: 18 August 2026
Requested by: Enzai
Reviewers:



Employee Resume Screening Assistant
5 requested AI solutions
Requested on: 19 June 2026
Requested by: Enzai
Reviewers:



Empower your organization to adopt, govern, and monitor AI with enterprise-grade confidence. Built for regulated organizations operating at scale.



