The original Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205, May 2024) was repealed via SB 26-189 in May 2026. The replacement regime takes effect January 2027, focused on Automated Decision-Making Technology that makes consequential decisions about Coloradans in employment, lending, housing, education, and healthcare.

SB 53 targets high-risk AI used in consequential decisions, with annual auditing and CA Civil Rights Department oversight. AB 2013 targets generative AI developers, requiring published training-data transparency. SB 53 applies to deployers; AB 2013 applies to GenAI developers selling in California.

The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act takes effect in 2026 and covers AI systems deployed by state agencies and certain private-sector deployments. It includes algorithmic transparency, consumer protections, AI risk assessment obligations, and notification requirements for AI-influenced decisions.

Each new state regime is added to Enzai's library of pre-built Compliance Frameworks centrally. Enzai builds the obligation mapping, control crosswalks, and evidence templates, then publishes the regime pack. Existing customers inherit the new pack automatically, with affected systems re-triggering assessment.

Yes, for the substantial overlap. The AI inventory, impact assessment, and risk-treatment evidence required by Colorado SB 26-189 substantially overlaps with what California SB 53 and Texas TRAIGA require. State-specific overlays sit on top of the shared evidence base.

US AI compliance is state and federal, not state alone. This hub covers state-level mandatory regimes; the NIST AI RMF page covers federal voluntary framework alignment. Most organisations operating in the US need both layers, and Enzai supports both within the same platform.