Colorado SB 26-189 Ready
ADMT focus, consequential-decision triggers, deployer impact assessment workflows.
California Coverage
SB 53 high-risk AI auditing + AB 2013 GenAI training-data transparency.
Texas TRAIGA Aligned
Broader AI governance obligations covering state-agency + private-sector AI use.
Cross-State Evidence
One inventory + one assessment base - state-specific overlays where rules diverge.
New State Absorbing
Next state regime added to library centrally - no per-customer rebuild required.
Federal Cross-Reference
Cross-linked to NIST AI RMF page for federal-contractor obligations.
Colorado today, the next state law tomorrow - without rebuilding your programme each time.
The US state AI compliance landscape - state by state
Five state regimes shape the current US state AI compliance picture, with several more in active legislative motion:
Colorado SB 26-189 (effective January 2027). The replacement law for the original Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205, repealed via SB 26-189). Focuses on Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) - AI systems making consequential decisions about Coloradans (employment, lending, housing, education, healthcare). Obligations: deployer impact assessments, consumer notice, opt-out rights, algorithmic discrimination protections.
California SB 53 (in force). Adds AI auditing requirements for high-risk AI systems used in consequential decisions, with annual reporting obligations and CA Civil Rights Department oversight.
California AB 2013 (in force). Generative AI training-data transparency - covered generative AI developers must publish summaries of training data used. Targets foundation model providers + GenAI vendors selling into California.
Texas TRAIGA (effective 2026). Texas Responsible AI Governance Act - broader AI governance obligations covering AI systems deployed by state agencies and certain private-sector deployments. Includes algorithmic transparency, consumer protections, and AI risk assessment requirements.
Emerging landscape. Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, and others have introduced AI-related provisions through consumer protection law, employment law, or sector-specific regulations. The pattern is fragmentation - each state framing the problem differently, with limited cross-state coordination.
Regime | Focus | Effective | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
Colorado SB 26-189 | ADMT - consequential decisions | January 2027 | Employment, lending, housing, education, healthcare |
California SB 53 | High-risk AI auditing | In force | Consequential decisions; annual reporting |
California AB 2013 | GenAI training data transparency | In force | Covered GenAI developers selling in CA |
Texas TRAIGA | Broader AI governance | 2026 | State agency + certain private-sector AI |
Federal Take It Down Act | Non-consensual intimate imagery | 19 May 2026 | Federal - applies in all states |
私たちは、お客様が答えを見つけるお手伝いをします
What's the current status of the Colorado AI Act?
The original Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205, May 2024) was repealed via SB 26-189 in May 2026. The replacement regime takes effect January 2027, focused on Automated Decision-Making Technology that makes consequential decisions about Coloradans in employment, lending, housing, education, and healthcare.
How does California SB 53 differ from AB 2013?
What does Texas TRAIGA cover?
How does Enzai handle a new state regime when it lands?
Can one inventory satisfy multiple state regimes?
How does this hub relate to your NIST AI RMF page?
24時間以内にご連絡いたします
さらなるソリューション
私たちの製品スイート
組織がAIを採用し、管理し、監視する能力を、企業レベルの信頼性で強化します。規模で運営する規制対象の組織向けに構築されています。